Docket HopperPart I · Bills · 119th H.R. 747
H.R. 747 · 119th CongressInternational Affairs

Stop Chinese Fentanyl Act of 2025 passed the House 217 days after introduction and awaits a vote in the Senate

Sponsored by Barr, Andy R-KY · 9 cosponsors: 2 Democrats, 7 Republicans
IntroducedJan 28, 2025
ReportedMar 5, 2025
Passed one chamberSep 2, 2025
Passed both—
Law—
What it changes · CRS summary

Written by the Congressional Research Service [2]. 248 words.

Stop Chinese Fentanyl Act of 2025 This bill subjects certain Chinese entities and government officials to potential sanctions related to opioid trafficking and requires the President to conduct certain preliminary analyses before regulating economic transactions in the event of a national emergency related to international drug trafficking. Specifically, for the purposes of the Fentanyl Sanctions Act, the bill changes the definition of foreign opioid trafficker to specify that the term includes (1) Chinese entities involved in the production or sale of synthetic opioids or related pharmaceutical ingredients that fail to take steps to detect or prevent opioid trafficking; and (2) certain senior Chinese government officials that aid and abet opioid trafficking, including through intentional inaction. Under current law, the President must impose certain sanctions on individuals and entities identified as foreign opioid traffickers. Further, the bill extends through 2029 an existing requirement that the President report to Congress annually on identified foreign opioid traffickers and any sanctions imposed on them. (This requirement expired in December 2024.) The bill also requires the President to take additional steps in issuing regulations under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) pursuant to a declared national emergency related to international drug trafficking. (IEEPA authorizes the President to regulate a variety of economic transactions following a declaration of national emergency.) Under the bill, the President must evaluate the costs and benefits of issuing economic regulations for the purpose of resolving the drug trafficking emergency and publish a discussion of such costs and benefits.

Context
Committees
House Financial Services Committee
House Foreign Affairs Committee
House Judiciary Committee
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee
Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee
Policy area
International Affairs: 94 of 4,008 bills became law, 113th–118th (2.3%)
Sponsor
4 of 203 bills enacted since 2013
Text versions
3, from introduced in house to referred in senate · 922 words
Subjects
AsiaChinaCivil actions and liabilityCongressional oversightDrug trafficking and controlled substancesPresidents and presidential powers, Vice Presidents +2 more
Latest action
Sep 3, 2025: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
Records
Congress.gov · Bill text
Exhibit 1Passage odds band at each stage, rated when the bill reached it [4]
Related bills · 0

The bill status record lists no related bills.

Exhibit 2Articles naming the bill per day, last 90 days, US sources [3]