Docket HopperPart I · Bills · 117th H.R. 263
H.R. 263 · 117th CongressPublic Law 117-243Animals

Big Cat Public Safety Act became law 708 days after introduction, with cosponsors from both parties

Sponsored by Quigley, Mike D-IL · 258 cosponsors: 206 Democrats, 52 Republicans
IntroducedJan 11, 2021
ReportedJun 15, 2022
Passed one chamberJul 29, 2022
Passed bothDec 6, 2022
LawDec 20, 2022
What it changes · CRS summary

Written by the Congressional Research Service [2]. 369 words.

Big Cat Public Safety Act This act revises requirements governing the trade of big cats (i.e., species of lion, tiger, leopard, cheetah, jaguar, or cougar or any hybrid of such species) under the Lacey Act to limit the possession, breeding, and exhibition of big cats. The Lacey Act prohibits any person from importing, exporting, buying, selling, transporting, receiving, or acquiring big cats across state lines or the U.S. border. However, some exemptions are provided for certain entities, such as universities and wildlife sanctuaries.

(Sec. 3) The act expands the Lacey Act prohibitions to include a prohibition on possessing or breeding big cats. Breeding means facilitating propagation or reproduction (whether intentionally or negligently), or failing to prevent propagation or reproduction. Owners of big cats that were born before this act's enactment may keep their big cats, but the owners must register them with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The act modifies the list of entities that are exempt from prohibitions to export, buy, sell, transport, receive, acquire, possess, or breed big cats. The modified list includes exemptions for entities or facilities exhibiting animals to the public if they (1) hold a Class C license in good standing under the Animal Welfare Act, and (2) do not allow individuals to come into direct physical contact with big cats. However, direct contact is allowed if the individual is a trained professional, a veterinarian, or directly supporting conservation programs that do not involve commercial activities and meet other specified restrictions.

(Sec. 4) A person who knowingly violates the act must be fined not more than $20,000, or imprisoned for no more than five years, or both. The act considers each violation to be a separate offense. The offense must be deemed to have been committed not only in the district where the violation first occurred, but also in any district in which the defendant may have taken or been in possession of the prohibited wildlife species.

(Sec. 5) The act extends forfeiture provisions to fish, wildlife, or plants that are bred or possessed; thus, big cats bred or possessed in violation of the act are subject to forfeiture.

(Sec. 6) The Department of the Interior must issue regulations to implement this act.

Context
Committees
House Natural Resources Committee
Policy area
Animals: 6 of 413 bills became law, 113th–118th (1.5%)
Sponsor
3 of 111 bills enacted since 2013
Text versions
6, from enrolled bill to public law · 1,365 words
Subjects
Animal protection and human-animal relationshipsCivil actions and liabilityCrimes against animals and natural resourcesMammalsMuseums, exhibitions, cultural centersTrade restrictions +1 more
Latest action
Dec 20, 2022: Became Public Law No: 117-243.
Records
Congress.gov · Bill text
Exhibit 1Passage odds band at each stage, rated when the bill reached it [4]
Related bills · 3

Each bill appears once, under its strongest link. 3 in all.

Procedural (rules, motions) · 1
  • 117th H.Res. 1256 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 263) to amend the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981 to clarify provisions enacted by the Captive Wi D · Agreed to
Related, per CRS or House · 2

See these 5 bills on the network map →

Exhibit 2Articles naming the bill per day, last 90 days, US sources [3]