Docket HopperPart I · Bills · 114th H.R. 4419
H.R. 4419 · 114th CongressPublic Law 114-257Government Operations and Politics

District of Columbia Judicial Financial Transparency Act became law 317 days after introduction, with no cosponsors

Sponsored by Norton, Eleanor Holmes D-DC · no cosponsors
IntroducedFeb 1, 2016
ReportedJul 12, 2016
Passed one chamberSep 22, 2016
Passed bothNov 29, 2016
LawDec 14, 2016
What it changes · CRS summary

Written by the Congressional Research Service [2]. 326 words.

(This measure has not been amended since it passed the House on September 22, 2016. The summary of that version is repeated here.) District of Columbia Judicial Financial Transparency Act

(Sec. 2) This bill amends the District of Columbia Code to revise the financial disclosure requirements for District of Columbia judges. The revisions establish new dollar thresholds and requirements for reporting to the District of Columbia Commission on Judicial Disabilities and Tenure the financial interests of the judges and specified family members with respect to: income; dividends, rents, interest, and capital gains; liabilities; gifts; real and personal property; honoraria; expense accounts or reimbursements for expenses; and waivers or partial waivers of fees or charges. The financial disclosure reports must be available for public inspection and copying, unless revealing personal and sensitive information could endanger the judge or a family member. A report may be redacted only: (1) to the extent necessary to protect the individual or family member, and (2) as long as the danger to the individual exists.

(Sec. 3) The Probate Divisions of the Superior Court of the District of Columbia may use magistrate judges.

(Sec. 4) DC courts may accept payment of fines, fees, escrow payments, restitution, bonds, and other payments by credit card or electronic funds transfer. The executive officer of the courts may contract with a bank or credit card vendor, or other third party provider, to accept such payments, making every effort to find the lowest cost vendor among them.

(Sec. 5) The maximum amount in controversy for cases under the Small Claims and Conciliation Branch of DC Superior Court shall increase from $5,000 to $10,000.

(Sec. 6) Each chief judge of the Superior Court or of the Court of Appeals, as appropriate, may delegate to an active or senior judge (in the court in which the chief judge sits) the authority to approve any compensation for court-appointed criminal defense or child abuse and neglect attorneys exceeding the usual maximum.

Context
Committees
House Oversight and Accountability Committee
Policy area
Government Operations and Politics: 580 of 5,914 bills became law, 113th–118th (9.8%)
Sponsor
6 of 559 bills enacted since 2013
Text versions
6, from enrolled bill to public law · 2,117 words
Subjects
District of ColumbiaGovernment ethics and transparency, public corruptionGovernment information and archivesJudgesJudicial procedure and administrationState and local courts +1 more
Latest action
Dec 14, 2016: Became Public Law No: 114-257.
Records
Congress.gov · Bill text
Exhibit 1Passage odds band at each stage, rated when the bill reached it [4]
Related bills · 1

Each bill appears once, under its strongest link. 1 in all.

Related, per CRS or House · 1
  • 114th S. 2966 District of Columbia Judicial Financial Transparency Act R · Reported

See this link on the network map →

Exhibit 2Articles naming the bill per day, last 90 days, US sources [3]